The top 15 pharma companies by 2017 revenue in USA
In many ways, 2017 was an uncertain year for biopharma as a
new, erratic administration entered the White House and federal government. The
industry came under fire early with then-President-elect Donald Trump's
comments that it was "getting away with murder" on pricing, but more
than a year later, biopharma has been spared real reform.
One certainty? The year wasn't without drama. On several
occasions, industry leaders butted heads with the president, most notably when
Merck & Co. CEO Kenneth Frazier, angered by the president's response to a
white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, quit Trump's executive
advisory board. Pfizer sued Johnson & Johnson in a lawsuit that could
reshape the U.S. biosim market; Merck suffered a costly cyberattack; Teva
announced a massive round of downsizing, and much more. GlaxoSmithKline, Eli
Lilly, and Teva each got new CEOs, while Novartis announced an upcoming CEO
transition.
At the same time, drugmakers chalked up scientific
advancements never before seen: Novartis and Gilead won the first CAR-T
approvals for Kymriah and Yescarta, respectively. Spark Therapeutics followed
those up with a nod for gene therapy Luxturna. They're the first in a wave of
next-gen, superpricey treatments for cancer and genetic diseases that will
challenge existing payment models.
Already, since Luxturna's approval, Spark has been working
to modernize payment systems for the therapy, including not only outcomes-based
contracts that other drugmakers have used but also new methods of spreading
payments over multiple years. The list price? A whopping $850,000.
Meanwhile, as pharma continues to face scrutiny on pricing,
payer partnerships and mergers promise to trigger tectonic shifts in the drug
supply chain—and that's in part a response to the very same pricing problem.
Cigna agreed to scoop up leading independent pharmacy benefit manager Express
Scripts, while CVS Health and Aetna are merging. Together, the two deals mean
the largest three pharmacy benefits managers by market share will be tied to
insurers. A year ago, only one was.
Plus, UnitedHealthcare and Aetna have pledged to return drug
rebates to some consumers, addressing a complaint by pharma that patients don't
benefit from tough behind-the-scenes negotiations. In recent years, the spread
between drug list prices and net prices has grown, but patients haven't
benefited, because they pay their share based on list prices, and many face
much larger deductibles than in years past.
President Donald Trump has pledged on many occasions to take
on drug prices, and last week his administration laid out its plan. The
administration called for more negotiating and incentives to bring down list
prices, but not importation or Medicare price negotiations. Overall, many
experts said pharma dodged policy proposals that could seriously disrupt its
business model.
As talk continues in Washington, D.C., many states have
taken up drug pricing, creating another headache for pharma. During Trump's
first year in office, industry trade group PhRMA significantly boosted its
lobbying spend to represent drugmakers on patent issues, Bayh-Dole march-in
rights, importation, Medicare price negotiations and more.
The year wasn't without changes from the U.S. government,
though. In December, the Trump administration and Congress ushered through tax
reform, which biopharma companies have overwhelmingly praised. Since the
reform, a wave of new M&A has hit the industry, most recently in April with
the massive tie-up between Takeda and Shire, both ex-U.S. companies.
New FDA chief Scott Gottlieb, M.D., has put through
significant changes of his own. He's pushed for more generic competition and
promised to "curtail gaming" of regulations that allow companies to
extend their patent monopolies. And those are just two of the changes he's
pushed at the FDA to lower costs; Fortune named him No. 6 on its list of the
world's best leaders for 2018.
In Gottlieb and HHS Director Alex Azar, a former Eli Lilly
executive, the pharma industry has allies in Trump's administration. It remains
to be seen just how the administration will try to fulfill its promise on drug
prices, but early reports indicate it'll be through tactics proposed by
Gottlieb, plus value-based pricing and other largely industry-friendly
approaches.
At this year's J.P. Morgan Healthcare conference in San
Francisco, Eli Lilly CEO David Ricks said the industry has allies in office and
had "better take advantage of that." This year is the "time for
action" on pricing, he added.
Among the top 15 drugmakers in 2016 and 2017, revenue grew
slightly to $551 billion last year—from about $524 billion in 2016. Eleven of
the Big Pharmas posted growth in 2017, while Pfizer, Gilead, Amgen and
AstraZeneca revenues shrank from year to year. Next year, pharma watchers can
expect to see a new addition to the list in Takeda, which is scooping up Shire
in a $62 billion deal. Together, the companies would have generated more than
$30 billion in 2017 sales, good enough for No. 8 among the top industry
players.
Many of the drugmakers provided their 2017 sales in local
currencies, so FiercePharma used an average conversion rate for the year of
1.13 euros to dollars and .098 Swiss francs to dollars. GlaxoSmithKline
provided its sales in U.S. dollars.
As we continue to track biopharma developments through 2018,
here are the top 15 drugmakers by 2017 revenue. If you have any questions or
comments, please get in touch.
Love to read it,Waiting For More new Update and I Already Read your Recent Post its Great Thanks.
ReplyDeleteGastroenterology